Weblog

  • "A picture is worth more than as many thousands of words you can come up with"

    Language is a mechanic we use to frame our thoughts and concepts - in doing so, language reflects back and our thoughts are constricted by our words.  We devise new terms and expand our vocabulary to provide clarity, so that each action, object, description we perceive or think of can be called out with a name.  Yet with the structure of English and Chinese, I am needed to idenfity a thing  (a noun) and give it action (a verb).  Why do some languages have sentence structures that give import to the position of something at the beginning or end?   And others - must I need to accept the idea of gender dichotomy in all things? If anything, I should feel less clarity - a loss of acuity of what something really is and a frame that reduces the fluidity and dynamacy of what things being really have. 

    How strange it is we use words to define words, almost like a cyclical argument... (this is really not strange at all, and something we do with most systems) [sidenote: what happens when you throw a new concept (word) into a system that infinitely reitterates on everything else in the system and itself...?]  
  • "Rigor mortis of the brain"

    I think two posts ago I was talking about forgetting and how starting blank again can be like the Cambrian explosion. That approach of a childlike mind extends and reaches in all directions making connections that we often have been habituated to think of as not plausible.  Such a subtly powerful method to escaping a paradigm.

    In the epilogue of his "The Structure of Evolutionary Theory," Stephen Jay Gould ends by making a long treatise on the importance of Darwin towards science... not the actual theories and science he published (the conclusions would have eventually been made) ... but by his metaphors, logical and literary skill and Darwin as a character.  [btw, "The Structure of Evolutionary Theory" is pretty much Gould's entire life's work poured into one last final publication before his passing (which he knew was coming)]  It wasn't just his science, but some kind of human emotive element there... in a sense, it was like art... becoming a much broader symbolic embodiment that would inspire and flame the imagination of young scientists for centuries to come. 

    He could have published his works dryly, been a dull scientist and the degree of his affect would have been much less.  I guess here is the segway then (seems like a popular word lately) - that forgetting is a paradigmatic escape but that strong inspiration by imagination is another.  A hero, a song, a work of art, a story, a character push in a way that often we rationalize as meaning very little practically and "real", but we cannot deny (at least I cannot) that somehow that emotive response can be so powerful in pushing the limits of what we think as plausible. 

    Whenever I watch a Miyazaki movie, I am entranced for a full two hours.  And at the end, my mind feels electric and alert, a strange contentment ... yet I suddenly feel a sense of deep sadness.  Maybe it's because I've left a fantastical world that brings me to brilliant expanses of what's possible.  Or maybe it's because I realize that often our world doesn't emphasize that stretching enough.  I guess it's the same fear I have of walking in a brilliant circle and never really knowing more, only doing more. Or how it made me uncomfortable to think that if I went into finance, I would be analyzing human-created economic systems created to understand human-created monetary systems, which were created to facilitate trade and barter... how we define what is reality is so often further removed from it.

    To end this post, I guess this was my appreciation for the arts and those that really dare to imagine.  Every bit of genius starts with a vision. And people need their heroes, their stories, their music and their characters to inspire and push the limits of their imagination.
  • Pathedy of Manners - Ellen Kay

    At twenty she was brilliant and adored,
    Phi Beta Kappa, sought for every dance;
    Captured symbolic logic and the glance
    Of men whose interest was their sole reward.

    She learned the cultured jargon of those bred
    To antique crystal and authentic pearls,
    Scorned Wagner, praised the Degas dancing girls,
    And when she might have thought, conversed instead.

    She hung up her diploma, went abroad,
    Saw catalogues of domes and tapestry,
    Rejected an impoverished marquis,
    And learned to tell real Wedgwood from a fraud.

    Back home her breeding led her to espouse
    A bright young man whose pearl cufflinks were real.
    They had an ideal marriage, and ideal
    But lonely children in an ideal house.

    I saw her yesterday at forty-three,
    Her children gone, her husband one year dead,
    Toying with plots to kill time and re-wed
    Illusions of lost opportunity.

    But afraid to wonder what she might have known
    With all that wealth and mind had offered her,
    She shuns conviction, choosing to infer
    Tenets of every mind except her own.

    A hundred people call, though not one friend,
    To parry a hundred doubts with nimble talk.
    Her meanings lost in manners, she will walk
    Alone in brilliant circles to the end.

  • I forget so I can reinvent...

    But again the below post is all part of one long string and I can't just stop there.  The ant took many paths but somehow it still knew it was all part of one singular straight path leading back to its origin. 

    Take the word "Shit."  Originally shit was probably just to describe feces but now it's this shit, that shit, what's up with this shit, that was the best shit I ever had, shit dude.  Maybe it was a vague concept to begin with but whatever its intention, it is so often lost in translation. If it were to ever reach a critical point, where its meaning was so variable and of a new value, the entire system would change... so that it was no longer there or be absorbed.  And in its place a whole new host of words trying to parse subsets or overlapping concepts (like "feces" to keep it defined) [Is it so different for Justice, Truth, or any word/phrase?] Look at the phrases "Axis of Evil," "the most beautiful thing I've ever seen," OMG! etc... and you see what I mean by the loss of meaning. 

    In biology, there is periodic equilibrium - a theory of evolution.  If you look at the pre-cambrian, Mesozoic, etc... you see a drastic disaster that caused the erasure of a huge percentage of living things...  And then right after, a huge species diversity explosion! In front of you, pixelations piece together to form colors and shapes.  But not only that, it is not a complete image that your eye and mind receive but bits of rays and lights and even more so, amalgamations of neural signals. Isn't that forces itself and cognition and what is living... things taking attributes beyond their parts? So wait, what was I trying to say... I forgot. 

    There are these hierarchies (like the frame and borders the word "Shit" can be taken to) and the systems we define bind things into these certain levels. At first there is an explosion that saturates the system which is then slowly limited and confined and constricted.  When you stretch and tug and pull at things inside this system, at some critical point it just completely pops and everything changes and repeats again. It's this character that is somehow defining of everything, even the constructed, this ebb and flow that is somehow a truth, a characteristic of the universe.

    It saddens me that I'll never be a beginner in Weiqi again.  That excitement of not being limited and exploring into the unknown is something I'll never grasp again.  It only happens once every Pre-Cambrian explosion.
  • "... an ant in the desert..."

    Is it so strange though? Somewhere along the line, humans created a distinction between themselves and other living organisms. Here's the line they said and they are there and we are here (in the same regards, here is what is living and there is what is not). Another empowering definition and systematic limitation.  But disparities are far and few and only when created!  There are blastulas being formed through hydrocarbon polarities, frogs changing sex in the forest due to population reaching a lower bounded critical mass, conical shells exhibiting the same shapes as found in the mandelbrot equation, ant using magnetic fields to walk a straight line back to his hole, and the body responding to pleasing music.  The human fetus resembles several other species during its transformations... why were borders needed to be defined and created so many times... most likely communication, expressing a definite concept or object etc...I am not criticizing this part, it was needed for sure! But of course it worked both ways and we see how it was abused so many times by men in power - defining things and/or giving them contextual reality that isn't (see any minority). Eventually it would be abused and contorted so badly that revolution would occur when it reached a critical point. But this is all part of something I'm trying to grasp or get at. 

    An ant leaves its hole scavenging for food in the desert.  Usually an organism uses landmarks or a scent trail or some other marking tool... but out in the desert, desert winds constantly shift the sands and there are little or no landmarks for the poor ant to find its way back to its nest.  Instead, the ant walks a certain distance, stops and rotates 360 degrees a few times. The ant is calibrating itself to the Earth's magnetic field. Then it continues many times in different directions in the same manner, stopping and rotating.   Finally once it has finished, it makes a straight line back to the hole. 

    I guess one thing I wanted to say was, why did I need to point to the autistic savant and exclaim something... everything I wanted to see and show was always there in everything, in that, in this, in ourselves. There was no reason not to be able to just look around and say "It's there, in that tree" But no, the ability somehow needs to be made to a human so there isn't that strange boundary between us, the cognitive and everything that is not.


  • "My prime objective"

    I remember what I wanted to write about.  My sister had told me about a documentary [Brainman] she had watched on autistic savants. Autistic savants may have difficulty performing daily tasks or holding a conversation yet can often perform incredible mental feats, such as very difficult computations or reproducing the exact ten notes on a piano (s)he had heard played simultaneously moments before. [The movie Rainman starring Tom Cruise and Dustin Hoffman was about an autistic savant.] 

    The part that struck a chord with me the most dealt with clay.  One autistic savant is catalogued with being asked "what color is your couch?"  To which he would respond "F major."  And then another is doing 9-digit multiplication while twiddling his fingers in the air as if molding objects.  But back to the clay... they asked questions like... is 12507 prime?  And he would know yes or no. The scientists asked him, "How do you know this?" And he would respond, "Shapes in my head." When given clay, the savant molded a shape of whatever form he saw in his head.  And to verify months later, they repeated the clay trials with the same numbers only to have the same respective shapes be molded once again.

    Is there any significance?  I don't know.  But when there is something above talented genius, this strange intrinsic knowing... it's a kind of hope to me. Whatever it is... this flickering inside the mind to map a color to a note, a frequency or seeing a number have a shape.

    Because, when you're searching for answers,  more times than not, you end up at a dead end.  A self-referencing deconstructed-to-nihl system that doesn't mean anything unless you've already ascribed it meaning. And then you discover what you're trying to think of is nothing new, something philosophers and their greatgreatgreatgreatgrandmothers have already puzzled and gotten nowhere for a few millenia.  And then people around you ask "What's the point if you get no answers and only a bunch of wasted [but conserved] energy?"  (I think some Hindu monk said the pursuit was what was important... but that's so often not enough either; a little "keep-it-up!" phrase bereft of support for what is trying to be a logical and empirical mind.)

    And that's why clay is significant for me. There's a person I can point to and say, "THAT GUY SOMEHOW KNOWS!!!... (without trying!!)"  That there's something intrinsic to a guy that lets him know... and that something is because of a pattern, in him, in all of us, in all things... relating together notes and colors and shapes and numbers. Finding a pattern and reason in the universe isn't an endless treadmill, because someone is perceiving that pattern (and it is that "I just know" that supports the existence).  Prime numbers made of clay are my new Hindu monks.  
  • "Is it with more clarity that you know the apple or everything it is not?"

    Behind everything that is there is everything it is not.  Is it with more clarity that you try and focus on the apple or understand everything it is not? How often is an abstract word and concept like happiness or evil hold for a different situation.  How is an apple different from another apple yet there is some common ground that assuredly marks it as an apple (or even for the simplest of concrete ideas, like a circle?).  When a shadow is cast, you can focus on the shadow and guess what it is or you can focus the the outline and the area it is not.  Sometimes one will show you the boundary better than the other and a better clarity you could not get before.

    Other than the idea of rigor, this is one area Mathematics ingrains so well where other fields are lacking.  For so many practices, we execute positve actions towards a goal.  But in a proof, this is often needlessly tedious or even impossible; we would need to exhaust an infinite number of possibilities or steps to arrive at the conclusion.  So, one of the first weapons is to take a look at all other cases.  It is this examination of the background that clarifies the foreground. 

    But hey, let us not stop at the background! Even before considering cases not involved, mathematicians often assume a universe where the apple does not even exist.  Then by saying the universe makes no sense without the apple, we rightfully assert the apple must exist. A person who often asks, "What if...?," is often stated as having "their heads in the clouds." But I respond that it is that idea of examining things for what they are not that gives our reality all the more clarity.
  • "You can't avoid pain by fencing yourself in.  Sometimes you need the help of others more than anything else.  But you have to let them help you."  - lyrics from DJ Tiesto song

    I was in Dallas last week when my mom and jiejie made an interesting comment.  They quoted some other guy saying, "If you can name five people who are truly good friends, then ...[something along of the lines that you can say you have a fortunate and happy life]."  Seems kinda duh, seems kind of simplistic, but finding five people who you can truly entrust your life to and be best friends with is something I find many people have a hard time doing - even amongst family. I think true friends are somewhat of a rarity, and being a person that people can be the best friend of, a rarity as well. 

    You can't progress as fast playing Chess against yourself.  You need a rival. People reveal and push each other at a speed no single person can achieve.  Sometimes a stubborn ass can't jump out of a paradigm without another stubborn ass a totally different side.
  • Maybe it just is. Maybe things just are.

    Went to Exploratorium earlier in the week.  Among some of my favorite exhibits were a 3d painting that looked 2d ( being the most impressive visual illusion I can remember ) and a sculpted spinning pedestal that had faces moving on the background behind as light struck it ( for its aesthetic feel ). 

    Most exhibits were demonstrating some scientific phenomena but one stuck out uniquely.  It seemed mathematical at first, many rotating octagonal discs labeled 1-8 hung along a long bar.  First you would randomly rotate the numbers so it would be much like randomly generating a number 1-8 many times. 

    152635245245612128382748641265121286246583214561246512452472.

    Then you would pick a number, count that many down the bar, and look at the new number and count from there down that many discs and repeat... until you finally get to a number that doesn't allow for enough discs to count any more.  Then you would remember that number and repeat the process all over again with the same disc alignment but different starting number.  It said "High chance of landing on the same number." I got 7 twice on the one I just randomly wrote above (Try it!). 

    At first, it was natural to think there was some numerical trick going on but examining the discs showed 1-8 on each one. After a moment's thought, it came to me that there a path [in this case] that leads to the end 7.  Basically with such a long string of numbers, whereever you start eventually has a high chance of landing on the path that leads to 7.  Thinking in reverse starting from 7, there branches outwards many paths that converge to it. 

    Next question, why would it be at Exploratorium among all these science & sensatory exhibits?  It could mimic many things, like predictable pathways molecules make based on initial angle and momentum... but that definitely leaves a curious paradigm for me.  What, if anything does that mean about fate, or the "direction" we move in?  If particles move in a manner governed by physics (maybe this is where quantum physics needs to step in), then maybe we're on some path that we have no control of... that will land on 7.
  • Climb a different path, climb a different mountain...

    So happy, found a different hike to go on finally. Best one we've found yet - strong slope adjacent to Stinson Beach and the ocean.  Cool breeze makes it pleasant even in Summer. 
    - strangest call I've heard in a while, bird let out a long, heavy resonating, almost unnatural sound.
    - a good hike alters foliage/scenery. At one point you can see how the moist sea winds cleave the slope, full green forest and suddenly a distinct border with stark yellow summer grasses.  Guess we chose to live on the wrong hot side,
    - middle of a deep forrested path, all green.  On the right side, a forked plant breaks the monotone green, two small orange bulbs dangle in unison like earrings.
    - one thing about going in a loop always forward, you always think everyone has chosen to go in the loop in the opposite direction... but that's just because it's harder for people to overtake going the same way.
    - didn't appreciate the Milford Sound hike I had in New Zealand as much as I have lately. So many funny incidents too... they looked at me incredulously at the airport when I brought the smallest pack... ended up eating all my canned food first day to lighten my pack furthermore... lungs felt like they collapsed crossing glacial river... girl peeked at me when I was in the can... rainy days... ended up having to help lots of people carry their pack.. walking in a valley flanked by a dozen waterfalls...

royu

  • Visit royu's Xanga Site
    • Member Since: 8/31/2003

About Me

  • Pragmatically ambivalent and mentally caustic. Addiction to Go/Weiqi. Seeking gestalts but not seeking nirvana. Love travel and seeing new cultures. Will pay good money to escape paradigm.